Still gnosing

That’s right, you heard me: I gnose. It’s the verb I’ve recently made up to describe my active interest in gnosticism. Since the word “gnosis” or knowledge is pronounced NO-sis, I believe that the verb “to gnose” should be pronounced with the long o sound rather than the short. I gnose, we gnose, you gnose; you get the idea.

Anyhoo, as I worked through Ms. Pagels’s The Gnostic Gospels, I came across (or was reminded of) The Gospel of Judas, and have simultaneously been reading Bart Ehrmann’s The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed. It’s actually been working well, because both books make many references to the Bible in comparison with the Gnostic Gospels, so I’ve been reading books of the Bible at the same time so that I have some idea of what they’re talking about. I read John last week, and next up is Mark and Matthew.

I don’t have anything intelligent to say about the differences between the canon and the books that were not included in the Bible, because Pagels and Ehrman obviously are better qualified and have written on the subject already. But I am curious about what people think of this sort of thing. What do you think about the Gnostic Gospels? What does it mean to you that there were gospels from the early Christian era that were not included in the Bible ultimately? If you’re not Christian, is there any comparable situation, say that relates to the Koran or the Book of Mormon?

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Still gnosing”


  1. 1 psyche September 1, 2007 at 12:19 am

    Islam has always had an esoteric branch in the Sufis and other mystics, but given the essence of submission, they were never seen as heretics. Mormonism can be seen as a late prophetic church, without need for external pseudepigrapha.
    Here are some more thoughts on Judas:

    http://www.psyche.com/psyche/suares/jesus_and_judas.html

  2. 2 tobeme September 11, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    I beleieve that the exclusion of books from the bible speaks volumes to the intentions of the mother church. It also illustrates that the Bible was manufactured by man to meet the needs and desires of man. The more you research this, the more questions you will have.

  3. 3 tobeme September 11, 2007 at 6:00 pm

    I beleieve that the exclusion of books from the bible speaks volumes to the intentions of the mother church. It also illustrates that the Bible was manufactured by man to meet the needs and desires of man. The more you research this, the more questions you will have.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s





%d bloggers like this: